Clinical evidence is essential to support chemistry, particularly in healthcare settings where product performance and safety are critical.
Independent scientific research helps demonstrate how our chemistry works in practice, supports regulatory and clinical decision‑making, and provides transparency for healthcare professionals using our products.
Strong chemistry is built on strong clinical evidence
Scientific validation is central to how our products are developed, tested and brought to market.
The publications available for download on this page include peer-reviewed studies published in recognised scientific and clinical journals.
Together, these articles contribute to the growing body of evidence supporting the efficacy, safety and value of our products and technologies.
Featured Studies
Can high risk HPV survive on medical devices after disinfection?
This study shows that chlorine dioxide can effectively inactivate native HPV 16 and 18 on ultrasound probes and nasendoscopes, even under realistic clinical conditions.
Download Now
Can chlorine dioxide overcome biofilms and antimicrobial resistance in healthcare?
This study shows that chlorine dioxide is highly effective against multidrug-resistant-organisms and biofilms, supporting its role in improving environmental decontamination and patient safety.
Download Now
Which disinfection method performs best in real clinical settings?
This study shows that chlorine dioxide wipes deliver equivalent microbiological efficacy while significantly reducing turnaround time and cost compared to traditional systems.
Download Now
How can a high-level disinfection protocol ensure effective disinfection of reusable ophthalmic equipment?
This study highlights how an adenovirus outbreak in a neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) was linked to contamination of reusable ophthalmic equipment, demonstrating the importance of appropriate disinfection practices.
Download Now
Wipe Disinfection Efficacy & Performance
Laboratory and controlled studies on chlorine dioxide effectiveness by wiping, looking at mechanics, and microbiology
Does wiping harder improve disinfection performance?
This study explores how differences in user-applied wiping force impact disinfection performance and reveals why consistent results do not depend on pressure alone.
Reference: Wipe disinfection – further investigation of variable wiping forces in a modified version of the EN 16615 surface test method
How quickly can disinfectants eliminate resistant mycobacteria?
This study shows that chlorine dioxide wipes achieve rapid mycobactericidal activity within 30 seconds when used with mechanical action.
Reference: Mycobactericidal activity of chlorine dioxide wipes in a modified prEN 14563 test
Can manual disinfection deliver consistent results every time?
This study shows that chlorine dioxide wipes can achieve fully reproducible high level disinfection, with no observed human error across all users tested.
Reference: Innovation can verify reproducible high‑level disinfection outcomes
Can chlorine dioxide overcome biofilms and antimicrobial resistance in healthcare?
This study shows that chlorine dioxide is highly effective against multidrug-resistant-organisms and biofilms, supporting its role in improving environmental decontamination and patient safety.
Reference: Biofilms and antimicrobial resistance in healthcare: evaluating chlorine dioxide as a candidate to protect patient safety
